I am leaving up this blog --from 2007-- for your amusement. AFG has finally convinced me that blogging, although satisfying on some levels, is eating into my more thoughtful writing.
Cheers!
AK
You gotta love a girl whose name boils down to 'excess.' ". . .John Amen publishes The Pedestal, a literary mag in North Carolina. Something of a savant, he sings and paints, but honestly, I think his muse has planted herself in the poems. Read what I mean here...
You have for lifetimes strummed minor chords
on the coast of a dead sea. Think major, spindrift.
The sex between you and grief is becoming mechanical.
Despite your vestigial sentiments to the contrary,
a scab's story is much greater than that of a scar.
Your cock is not an umbilical cord, it is your
heart's mouthpiece. Choose sunrise, please.
It is time to do something that might cause
embarrassment. Let emptiness mother your child.
Put away the map, where we're going won't be on it.
There is nothing particularly inspiring about a death wish.
You have learned all there is to learn from the woman in black."

"I first met the Girl in the Bone Bikini 13 years ago; she came on like a hurricane wrapped in Christmas, a Tasmanian angel shattering every color we'd ever mistaken for light. At first I thought she was goddess Kali, but the curve of her hip was more Nataraja than Little Black Peep, and her mind --puissant and entirely open-- was like a bath in hot silk."This discovery goes along with other pieces of the project that have been on the rise for the last few weeks. As I perused these recovered pages of MGBB, I see bits of Tantra for Bobos peeking through. It's as if one is the invisible architecture of the other. Very cool...
"So, then, if everything is made of the same sort of stuff as tables and chairs (as per monism), and if at least some of the things made of that sort of stuff are conscious (there is no doubt that we are), and if there is no way of assembling stuff that isn’t conscious that produces stuff that is (there’s no emergence), it follows that the stuff that tables, chairs and the bodies of animals (and, indeed, everything else) is made of must itself be conscious. Strawson, having wrestled his angel to a draw, stands revealed as a panpsychist: basic things (protons, for example) are loci of conscious experience."Everything is conscious? EVERYTHING is conscious? Well, now doesn't that elide the whole problem rather nicely. According the current rules of the scientistic game, a thing can't investigate, experience itself; to do so is a 'tautology' - from the German 'taut' - dead. So are we existing in a functional 'deadology'? Deadology. Deadology. You know, that fits. Intuitively, it fits like a playtex glove. This is precisely why the 'hard problem' will not be solved within the sophistries, permutations and nuances of materialist/dualist positionings. Because (and go slowly with me through this idea, otherwise it will slither away, unthought) the quality of consciousness --a kind of interior tension-- that keeps scissioning itself into me-aware/table-unaware, cannot look at continuity with anything but terror of extinction. That terror *names* the continuity 'tautology.'


"In his delightful neo-Gnostic novel Monsieur, Lawrence Durrell writes that there are four "M's" that characterize our age: monotheism, messianism, monogamy, and materialism. Enlisting Freud's scatological interpretation of money, he adds that all of these equal another "M" - merde.1" "Goddesses, Yes!" Stephan Hoeller.I'm not too sure I'd call Monsieur delightful, given that its theme is the nature of evil (I was going to write 'human evil' but really, what else is there?), but I was amused to see the good Reverend Hoeller counting the Durrellian M's. The fifth element 'money/merde' is too accurate, no?
(You know I'm getting around to something. Hang in there.)"Oh, I think what I want for this year is fairly simple: I want to document the passage of wisdom from the body of an artist into the social body that enfolds him/her. I want to be fully engaged in this when it is time, to wake up each day knowing that's why I am here. And with that focus in place, to give it spontaneous and free rein.""...when it is time," I wrote. So is it time yet? I've had some exuberant successes (and one still-imponderable failure) in this realm, but by 2009 I think 18 years will have been enough of a warm-up. This is still what I want to do. With one important variation. It occurs to me that I must surrender the documentarian role, and create the opening from my body to this milieu.


Since we decided to auction off Oracle earlier this month, most of my attention has been on writing the essay for that piece. My limited (ahem) access to the artist means that I have to focus more on the art history than the specific work. Still. This is where being an oneirocritic comes in handy. If the work is derived from a lively, imaginal space, you can always trace a way back to the source from its eidos, the image that appears in hypnogogia. Whatever you find there is all you need to know of an artwork. This is the painting's chorion, its Arcadia - what it really wanted to be when it came into the world. Everything else is just so much arthouse popcorn."We all need a laugh or a little pick me up -- and you're the designated sign [Cancer] right now to do this for the rest of the world. It's a big job but you can do it because the best way to send an idea is to wrap it up in a person."
from Georgia Nichols' astrology website
"The discovery of mirror neurons in the frontal lobes of macaques and their implications for human brain evolution is one of the most important findings of neuroscience in the last decade. Mirror neurons are active when the monkeys perform certain tasks, but they also fire when the monkeys watch someone else perform the same specific task. There is evidence that a similar observation/action matching system exists in humans. The mirror system is sometimes considered to represent a primitive version, or possibly a precursor in phylogeny, of a simulation heuristic that might underlie mindreading. Today, mirror neurons play a major explanatory role in the understanding of a number of human features, from imitation to empathy, mindreading and language learning."and
"[N]eurologist Derek Denny–Brown of Harvard demonstrated that animals and people with a frontal lobe injury display an odd, but fascinating, behavior: Even when not appropriate, they touch or grasp things and then have trouble letting go. Termed physically “adherent,” such brain–injured subjects are incapable of letting go or disengaging from the adhered–to object. In 1966, Oliver Zangwell of Cambridge expanded Denny–Brown’s observations by showing that frontal lobe damage or dysfunction was clearly associated with a disruption in divergent [creative or innovative] reasoning.
In 1984, Brenda Milner of the Montreal Neurological Institute showed that patients who had surgical removal of parts of the frontal lobe (for the treatment of medically intractable epilepsy) were impaired at divergent reasoning as assessed by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. [ . . .] The impairment displayed by Milner’s patients was not related to the performance of the initial sort, but rather to their inability to diverge from a successful sorting strategy even when provided with the information that this strategy was no longer correct. These patients were locked in a “mental adherence” and could not let go—they were stuck."

e.g.:: Don't waste your emotional energy (water), and write.
"Peekapeeka, risky business...Not to worry, cM will be given her very own essay to chew up for a year or so. Prolly "Cybersoma/Space, Part B" (B-for-Blagueuse).
All dat blood, you gotta follow dat mess.
('Let's go!') hie! hiehiehiehide!" UuuepEp!"
-dByrne


I am deep in the throes of reconsidering the cognitive --or maybe 'sensory' is more accurate-- effects of this hybrid seeing/hearing/blogologuing. What am I writing is not really an update of Cybersoma/Space, since I am in no longer in control of the academic vernacular which styled that article. But it's on the same acreage, if not in the same park.
